 
      For the third year, the curators Dimitrina Sevova, Alain Kessi and 
        Emil Miraztchiev together with the ArtToday Foundation, Plovdiv 
        present  
      Communication Front 2001, 
        Plovdiv, Bulgaria 
      /project of electronic and media art and theory/  
      At the Center for Contemporary Art in the Ancient Bath, 
        Plovdiv and the ArtToday Lab, Plovdiv  
      From 1 to 14 June 2001  
      Under the title: Cyber and my sp@ce _ Netizens and the new geography 
       
      General background on CFront 
       CFront 2001 <http://www.cfront.org> 
        is the third edition of the curatorial project Communication Front and, 
        like the two previous years, is an international event oriented towards 
        the production of works and analyses on a concrete topic, chosen to be 
        directly relevant to the concrete situation of the Internet and media 
        art and culture community, raising critical questions of immediate concern 
        to that community. This year, we chose to focus on the relation between 
        cyberspace and physical space and the ways new communication technologies 
        structure one and the other, and specifically how they influence the art 
        and culture community.  
      CFront is a platform consisting of three approaches, a Theoretical Meeting 
        for developing ideas relating to the development of new media and cultural 
        politics in the region, a Working Seminar for producing a Web site presenting 
        and developing further the results of the discussions in the Theoretical 
        Meeting in the form of texts and art-works inspired by the discussions, 
        and an exhibition closely linked to the topic of the Theoretical Meeting. 
       
      CFront purposely avoids having festival or conference character, taking 
        a critical stance to what Tapio Makela, Susanna Paasonen (both Finland) 
        and Steve Bradley (USA) have called "media tourist" (http://www.cfront.org/cf00/workshop/tourist/index.html), 
        namely "experts" travelling from town to town, from country 
        to country, to present one and the same lecture to different audiences. 
        As opposed to this, CFront includes the participants in a work process, 
        in which new ideas and analyses, and Web-oriented works, are developed 
        in collaboration. The concrete contacts between the participants over 
        the period of two weeks allow us to build on the experience of each and 
        on the results of previous projects and networking efforts, and to prepare 
        the way for further networked activities and bring important discussions 
        a step forward.  
      The discourses and ideas developed in the context of CFront are 
        closely linked to a continuous international process. While being firmly 
        anchored in the reality of Bulgarian and South-East European electronic 
        and media art and theory, the project is tightly embedded in the European 
        and world-wide media culture environment. CFront stands in a line of international 
        projects with similar working and networking character, like Geert Lovink's 
        temp.media.lab in Helsinki, with the working meeting "The Future 
        State of Balkania" (October 1999, http://www.savanne.ch/balkania), 
        or his Hybrid WorkSpace, which took place during the Documenta X (1997) 
        in Kassel, the MoneyNations project that started in December 1998 at Shedhalle 
        in Zurich (http://www.moneynations.ch/) 
        and then developed into several working meetings in different countries, 
        the series of working seminars and festivals OSTranenie at Bauhaus Dessau 
        (1993-1997), Lina Dzuverovic-Russell's and Lisa Haskel's tech-nicks project 
        at The Lux Gallery, London, that lasted for four weeks in summer 2000 
        (http://www.noaltgirls.org/tech_nicks), 
        and numerous others. A number of such projects are presented in "The 
        Hybrid Media Lounge" (http://www.medialounge.net). 
        Descriptions and reports on projects similar in structure to CFront can 
        be found in the archive of the Syndicate mailing list at <http://www.v2.nl/mail/v2east/>. 
       
      The Regional Context 
       Although Western curators and critics, the Art World with a big A, developed 
        some interest in Eastern European artists in the 90ies, this has remained 
        rather limited, and does not easily give these artists opportunities to 
        realize themselves in this context. The net.art and media art community, 
        on the other hand, has developed a broad network of contacts also in Eastern 
        Europe, which has given rise to opportunities for collaborations on a 
        variety of levels. The medium of the Internet and the less institutionalized 
        functioning of the media art community provides opportunities for more 
        even participation of artists, theorists and writers regardless of their 
        geographical location.  
      To this day, for a large part of the art and culture community in Bulgaria 
        and the region, the access to the international Internet and media art 
        and culture community has remained limited, due to problems of access 
        to technology, but also a lack of knowledge about possible uses of these 
        technologies, and a lack of local context in which to develop ideas and 
        work, and of international contacts to facilitate their integration in 
        ongoing projects.  
      To overcome these barriers, there is a need for international events 
        like Communication Front in which artists, curators and theorists from 
        Bulgaria, other Balkan countries and the world at large meet and develop 
        common perspectives in concrete collaborational work around current and 
        important problems and questions, with which discussions and ideas on 
        these questions are advanced in an international context of media art 
        and culture and of the information society.  
      "Cyber and my sp@ce _ Netizens and the new geography" 
       The personal computers, e-mail, World Wide Web can be seen as tools 
        with which to achieve a given set of tasks. More important however for 
        our discussion is that in combination they give rise to what we can call 
        a digital revolution, and open up an entire new social (virtual or cyber) 
        space, with a whole variety of social groups with their respective codes 
        of behavior. The driving forces for the development and structuring of 
        this space are the rising power of technologies, the standardization of 
        communication protocols, including the worldwide spread of English and 
        the Latin alphabet, and the restructuring and decentralization of production 
        and marketing processes by large international companies.  
      The corporate cyberspace (company Intranets) exerts a powerful pressure 
        on the structuring of the public cyberspace. The rise of e-business, e-advertising 
        and e-services reconfigures fundamentally the virtual geography. Search 
        engines like Altavista have modified their way of sorting search results 
        to give preferential treatment to business companies as compared to the 
        average personal home page. You either pay, or your page becomes less 
        visible.  
      Can we find, in virtual geography, structures similar to cities, to neighborhoods, 
        or other structures known from physical space? To what extent do the Web 
        communities, consisting of users attracted by commercial portal sites 
        like Yahoo, GMX or MSN/Hotmail with free e-mail and other services, show 
        characteristics similar to those of a city or neighborhood? It may be 
        interesting to note that the digital `cities' build up around market needs, 
        much like the physical cities of the middle ages.  
      The term Netizen (from Net & citizen) was introduced back in the 
        mid-70ies, at the time of the first Usenet fora and long before the World 
        Wide Web would give access to the Internet to a broad audience. The Netizens 
        of the time debated the freedom of speech, the development of the Internet 
        and perspectives for the future of communication. In 1980 the MacBride 
        Commission to the UNESCO <http://www2.hawaii.edu/~rvincent/mcbcon1.htm>, 
        named after one of the leaders of Netizens, prepared a special report 
        on the future of communication. In the report titled "Many Voices 
        _ One World", the commission criticized the unequal access to information, 
        which in practice leaves the countries of the Third World without a voice. 
        The commission demanded a free flow of information.  
      A large part of the world population (as well as of the Balkan population) 
        are `PONA' _ People of No Account. They have no access to the Net, or 
        if they do, they have insufficient knowledge about it to use it. They 
        form what Olu Oguibe has called the `digital third world' <http://camwood.org/springer.htm> 
        (see also <http://eserver.org/internet/oguibe/>). 
        The Internet, in its development, ignores local interrelations and jumps 
        over borders. How will the relations between Netizens and remaining `PONA' 
        pockets in various locations develop?  
      If someone from the Balkans, or another `PONA'-dominated region, has 
        a personal access to the Net, does that automatically make her/him part 
        of the Internet community? How does the lack of a supporting (sub-cultural) 
        environment influence her/his possibilities for contributing to an innovative 
        development of the Internet community?  
      Robin Bloor extends the meaning of the concept `PONA' to include people 
        who do have access to and knowledge about the Internet, but who access 
        it through Internet Cafes and other anonymous access providers. A typical 
        example of this case is hackers. How will people escaping identification 
        be considered by other Netizens? How might mechanisms installed to prevent 
        anonymity and activities considered as suspect turn into instruments of 
        censorship that could, among other things, place restrictions on art projects? 
       
      In the interactive `jungle' of cyberspace, on mailing lists such as Syndicate 
        and nettime and a variety of smaller lists, that have formed like global 
        neighborhoods around people with a common interest in media culture and 
        Net practices, important questions about the development of the cultural, 
        artistic and social environment in cyberspace. Such fora provide artists, 
        theorists, writers and others from Eastern Europe with a feeling of community, 
        with a way to interact socially while escaping the structures of the local 
        art scene.  
      Is there a private space on the Internet? What could private space mean 
        on the Internet at all? Maybe closed chat rooms can be compared to hotel 
        rooms that provide the coziness of a temporary rented `private' space? 
        How does the illusion of private space, through personalization of public 
        cyberspace pioneered by e-commerce giants like Amazon, affect the relation 
        of people/clients to cyberspace?  
      Given that the Internet never sleeps and has no opening hours, how does 
        this time regime affect Internet users and the Net community as a whole? 
       
      How do people use communication technologies (and thus fill them with 
        "sense" or "meaning"), and how do technologies influence 
        and change people?  
      The focus of CF01 on space and its structuring allows references to historical 
        discussions of women's movements in the 70ies on relations between the 
        (private) personal and the (public) political spaces. How have the radical 
        changes in recent years, under the influence of new technologies and means 
        of communication, affected the relations between urban space, cyberspace, 
        working space, personal space, as well as, in parallel, the relations 
        between people among themselves and between people and technologies. How 
        do gender relations express themselves on the Internet? What kind of professional 
        and social hierarchies can be found? What is the effect of voyeurist projects 
        breaking the taboo of the personal space? Does the gendered hierarchy 
        between client and service personnel get carried over from physical into 
        cyberspace?  
      
      The different parts of CF01 
      The exhibition "Cyber and my sp@ce"
       This year's CFront exhibition presents multimedia installations by women 
        artists. The exhibition opens on 6 June in the downstairs exhibition space 
        of the Mexican House in the Old City of Plovdiv, where the theoretical 
        meeting and working seminar are taking place. It will remain open until 
        21 June. We hope that by organizing an exhibition of women artists' works 
        in the context of an international project like CFront we can contribute 
        to overcoming the isolation of Bulgarian and South-East European women 
        artists, to creating a context in which they can further develop socially 
        critical art practices, and to legitimizing feminist approaches.  
      The theoretical meeting 
      In daily round-table discussions and work in smaller groups (5 hours 
        a day), the participants will develop new ideas on relations between people 
        and technologies and social changes under the influence of new technologies, 
        and texts to be published online and in book form bilingually in English 
        and Bulgarian. The working language for the seminar is English.  
      The working seminar 
       Taking up ideas from the round-table discussions, the participants will 
        develop web-based artistic projects (texts, sound, artworks, software) 
        in a common process, while developing at the same time an integrated interface 
        for the web site. The working language of the seminar is English.  
      The accompanying program of public lectures 
       In daily evening lectures, the participants will present to a local 
        audience their work and experience in the field of media culture. A special 
        emphasis will be put on discussions after the lecture. The lectures will 
        be in English, with consecutive translation to Bulgarian.  
 
         
      
        
         |